And it’s a NO for me
October 10, 2017
Another year and another rejection in the London Marathon ballot.
Maybe one day, I’ll get a Good For Age place, but that would take a lot of training as I would need to be able to maintain a 5:19km.
I really enjoyed running Southampton Marathon earlier this year, but think I’m more likely to aim for Southampton Half in April as I’ll be running a marathon at the Long Course Weekend in July.
I’ve read a lot of discussion online about the allocation of London Marathon places. Some people believe it’s fair as Good For Age places exist and that ‘anyone can train to get a Good For Age place’ (I’m not sure I agree that anyone can achieve the standards). Others feel that it should go back to the old system where after a number of rejections, you automatically get a place. Others believe that you should have completed a half marathon before being allowed to apply for a place. Another alternative would be to have a system like NYRR run for the New York Marathon where anyone who volunteers at a set number of events (I think it’s 10 NYRR races) can get a place in New York Marathon. Of course, that scheme is much more achievable for someone who lives in the area. Another suggestion that I’ve heard is to delay the ballot until longer after the race so that only the dedicated remember to enter.
I think that it’s great that the television coverage of London Marathon inspires so many people to take up running, and it’s brilliant that it raises so much money for charity, but in many ways it has become a spectacle, rather than being a race, with so many people wearing fancy dress or trying to set crazy records. I know some people will disagree with me, but I do think it would be helpful to require people who apply for the ballot to have run a half marathon within the previous 24 months. Yes, this would be a barrier to participation, but if someone is desperate enough to get a place then it’s a hoop they can easily jump through. I also think that if someone has been allocated a place through the ballot then they should not be able to enter the ballot for the next 2 years (or possibly longer). I know the ballot is down to chance, but when there are so many people who would really like to get a place, this would give people more of an opportunity (and seems fairer than the date restrictions of entering the ballot that existed in the past).
Do you think the allocation of places is fair? If not, what solution would you propose?
My colleague, Sarah, was lucky enough to get a place in the ballot and has decided to chronicle her training in a new blog: Marathon? WTF? (Where’s the finish line?) Please do visit, have a read and consider sponsoring her 🙂
Thank you to everyone who’s voted for Fat Girl to Ironman so far – there’s still time to cast your vote in The 2018 Running Awards.